Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ach. Brito

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Keeping for now to allow for improvement using other language resources, etc. We can always re-nominate for deletion if needed in the future, but hopefully not. Missvain (talk) 15:56, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ach. Brito[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In order to establish notability, an article about an organization or company must meet WP:ORGCRITE. This is a somewhat higher standard than WP:GNG; it requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." This article does not meet those criteria. The first reference provides nothing more than a directory entry: that does not qualify as "significant coverage." The second reference and the external links are authored by the company itself, meaning that they are not independent. WP:BEFORE reveals no other satisfactory sources that could be included. At the end of the day, this article contains no sources that would pass WP:ORGCRITE, much less the "multiple" sources required by that standard. Accordingly, the article should be deleted. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:59, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:59, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:59, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There seems to be enough coverage in Portuguese language sources. Since i am not familiar with the language, i am not sure if these sources demonstrate notability[1][2][3][4]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faizal batliwala (talk • contribs) 13:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A Google search does seem to bring up a good number of Portuguese-language references that appear reliable. I have also located this English article from 2011 that does a decent job of discussing the company in some detail. I think there is enough here for someone to attempt a rescue of the article instead of deleting it.--Concertmusic (talk) 22:11, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:09, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Since there appears to be some potential for saving this article, I listed it at WP:RSL. If no one steps in to rescue it within a week or two, I (the nominator) would suggest that deletion (or possibly draftification) would be appropriate. If someone can rescue it, I will gladly withdraw the nomination. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep https://www.reuters.com/article/us-portugal-soaps/portugal-soap-maker-still-cleaning-up-122-years-on-idUSTRE51J4A220090220 Coverage from that, and even Oprah Winfrey praised them [5]. Dream Focus 10:54, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Is the company named Ach Brito, Ach. Brito, or Claus Porto? Dream Focus 11:02, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:02, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.