Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AccuFund

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AccuFund[edit]

This is a supplier of accounting software. The article has been written by the company's VP and is very short on independent references. Many Google hits, and probably the existing reference, are press releases. It appears to fail WP:CORP. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 00:58, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral. Perhaps just a cleanup would do it, otherwise Delete. Extranet ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 01:23, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete, there isnt much about the company or product on the web, so unless neutral reviews in magazines can be found, the subject isnt encyclopedic. Sadly, I know of this product due to its grants management capabilities. John Vandenberg 02:48, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails to provide reliable references which would help assess notability. As such, I am inclined to think it fails notability criterion of WP:CORP. It also is written like an ad for the accounting software, not an article about the company. And if written by the VP, its WP:COI. --soum (0_o) 04:16, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now. No sources. Arbustoo 05:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails to establish notability, and looks suspiciously as if it has been placed here for publicity purposes. BTLizard 09:27, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:CORP --Infrangible 04:36, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.