Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accipiter RPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accipiter RPG[edit]

NN online forum, fails WP:WEB. Much of article written by User:Accipiter RPG, against spirit of WP:AUTO/WP:VAIN

delete Percy Snoodle 08:47, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fancruft at best (authorcruft at worst). Worst of all, having skimmed the whole article, I still have no clue as to what "Accipiter RPG" actually is... --Thorsten1 09:26, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the article reads like they are trying to use Wikipedia as a webhost. "Sorry, the server is down." Uh, go away. Recury 14:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Daveydw ee b (^chat/_patch) 00:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete not an article. Is that forest made from pot leaves? 01:19, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Both of the textures in the image are GIMP's stock fill patterns, actually, unless I'm mistaken... --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 09:08, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failure of WP:WEB. Daveydw ee b (^chat/_patch) 08:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, doesn't say why the thing matters. Some RPG forum. Article says they're having slight problems keeping people around. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 09:08, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete per nom Altair 17:29, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.