Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accademia Filarmonica Romana

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)UY Scuti Talk 19:45, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accademia Filarmonica Romana[edit]

Accademia Filarmonica Romana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

for as long as this group as been around, I'm not seeing any sort of coverage of it Prisencolin (talk) 23:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. To see "any sort" of coverage about this orchestra we simply need to click on the words "news", "books" and "scholar" above. One example among hundreds is this review of a book about the orchestra. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 08:40, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:46, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:46, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep yes, I think there are enough news articles about the organization—all easily readable via Google Translate, if in Italian. The Tempi article states that it is "one of the oldest Italian music institutions." Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The sources appear to be there for anyone who can translate them. --Deskford (talk) 14:20, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree with your sentiments, but would prefer to say that the sources appear to be there for anyone who can read them. No translation is needed. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 20:54, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.