Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Absolute FreeBSD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Protonk (talk) 22:05, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Absolute FreeBSD[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable book. No references, author has no article, Google news search finds no significant coverage from independent reliable sources. MikeWazowski (talk) 13:36, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep [| Open up your one eye wider, mike] :) Plenty of references out there, (per Google). On the article, two are junk ,the distro watch and the Freebsd website, neither mention this book, however,both O'Reilly and No Starch press (reliable and known publishers) reference this book, as does Safari books and Amazon.It's reliable, (not to mention FreeBSD rocks as an OS! )

@-Kosh ► Talk to the Vorlons►Markab-@ 20:20, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All I really see there are forums and blogs. TheWeakWilled (T * G) 21:10, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can find no coverage about this book in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 15:42, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 11:21, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources and cited assertions to demonstrate the notability of this book. Hasteur (talk) 20:53, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; falls short of notability. bobrayner (talk) 21:22, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.