Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Absinthe Films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash^talk 01:36, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Absinthe Films[edit]

Tagged as not-notable, I removed the tag and brought it here. Abstaining for now. brenneman ^{T}^{L} 00:00, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - gets 96,400 ghits, which ain't bad, but this (and Futureproof) hardly merits its own article - could be a link in Snowboarding article, but nothing more. Camillus (talk) 00:26, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above. Royboycrashfan 00:39, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable film company. --Ter e nc e Ong (恭喜发财) 02:58, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Advertising? Agree with comments about linked site Futureproof also. VirtualSteve 05:35, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not mention a notable snowboarding film product. The film it does mention should probably be nominated for AfD too. Ruby 05:39, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep and expand. This is a legitimate snowboard film company. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 08:19, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn, its only 260 unique google hits. Plus a 3 mil alexa rating for their site, and cant find it on imdb -- Astrokey44|talk 11:45, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Meritus 14:31, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete borderline advertising for nn film company --† Ðy§ep§ion † ^{Speak your mind} 20:08, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn. Mikker ^... 23:36, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 03:59, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, legit snowboard film company, as demonstrated by the interview, and 260 unique google hits. Kappa 10:16, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep, as per Kappa. Englishrose 12:19, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the sheer number of google hits. Grue 16:09, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable, per Astrokey44 and others. Ifnord 22:31, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Futureproof[edit]

Rolling in the film linked from the article, as probably even less notable than the company itself. Delete to both. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 23:02, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn per nom. Mikker ^... 23:39, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nomination --Mecanismo | Talk 00:36, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 03:59, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
merge with the company. Kappa 10:16, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with the company. Englishrose 12:19, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above. Grue 16:09, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Avi 21:22, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable, per Astrokey44 and others. Ifnord 22:30, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.