Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Shukla VK

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 16:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Shukla VK[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely promotional, essentially a resumé of the person, only sources cited is the person's social media. Gaioa (T C L) 15:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (possible speedy A7): An article moved to draft but then returned to mainspace by the WP:SPA article creator. The article is sourced to self-published references and Indian media searches are finding no coverage of this person. Notability is not inherited from work in a functional role as a dubbing voice; fails WP:ENTERTAINER. AllyD (talk) 16:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per fails WP:Notability and other applicable notability criteria. Also, WP:Autobiography according to Talk:Abhishek Shukla VK (permalink), which means the author has a WP:Conflict of interest and should not have moved it out of draft: space in the first place. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG for a BLP. Kolma8 (talk) 21:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of reliable references. Notability is in question. Niceguylucky (talk) 15:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not appear to pass our notability criteria. Referencing is also very poor, a symptom of lack of notability Fiddle Faddle 17:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails to pass WP:GNG Padavalam🌂 ► 16:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.