Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Sagar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:29, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Sagar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poor source. Most of the source are primary. WP:BLP fail Siddiqsazzad001 (TALK) 11:50, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Also could not find independent references that support notability. London Hall (talk) 11:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This page is created with proper permission of the Author Abhishek Sagar,Please do not remove it ,you can even enquire the author from his mail ,The page should not be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Social XD (talk • contribs) 12:06, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Social XD: Wikipedia is not a place or a website for doing self promotional campaigns or advertising. You should be neutral and should be able to follow notability guidelines when creating quality articles. Can you find at least one unique reliable primary source to prove the content you provided in the article? Please refer to this :- WP:NOT. Abishe (talk) 12:22, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom. Fails to establish notability. reddogsix (talk) 14:31, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom, and it smells like COI. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:15, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. No independent reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 00:43, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.