Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Kochhar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Abhishek Kochhar[edit]
- Abhishek Kochhar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't see any notability, plus WP:AUTO by User:B Limited. bender235 (talk) 17:26, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - promising, youngest, and up-and-coming, but not notable by any stretch. See also WP:CRYSTAL and WP:HAMMER. Bearian (talk) 22:13, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Prior AfD is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek kochhar (prior to article move). —SpacemanSpiff 15:21, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. Also, with a prior AFD more input is needed to determine if consensus has changed. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete Completly fails WP:BIO. The award doesn't establish notability. scope_creep (talk) 02:53, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.