Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Gandhi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 06:15, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Gandhi[edit]

Abhishek Gandhi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Sam Sailor Sing 15:59, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Sing 15:59, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Sing 15:59, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Sing 15:59, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:TOOSOON. From the article, he appears to be a Ph.D. student, not someone with his own independent research program. People at that level pass WP:PROF only extremely rarely, and he does not appear to be one of the exceptions. In particular his Google scholar profile lists only two papers with three citations, far far beneath the threshold for criterion #C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:05, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:31, 24 June 2014 (UTC).[reply]
  • Delete Sources are not enough to establish notability.--Skr15081997 (talk) 06:10, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete PhD student who's not notable yet. Way too soon. Does not meet WP:PROF. Cowlibob (talk) 10:17, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.