Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhinay Banker (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:04, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abhinay Banker[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear the actor is notable; most of the footnotes are to articles about things with which he is connected, not about him. Orange Mike | Talk 14:59, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep : I originally nominated the article, but I think it has been much better since. Even includes a few WP:RS, which are specifically about him, such as this, this, this, so I am inclined towards keep. Coderzombie (talk) 16:46, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- comment - is there a template for "so cluttered with non-reference references that you can't spot the tiny handful of actual substantive mentions"? --Orange Mike | Talk 16:50, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know about the template, but you do have my sympathies. Coderzombie (talk) 17:20, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep there are enough reliable sources such as Times of India and other press coverage that confirms that he is notable enough to pass WP:BASIC Atlantic306 (talk) 16:56, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Quoting : Adding another user's comment, which he seems to have put on talk page instead of here.

I don't understand what is the reason for 2nd time nomination!
We all have discussed about it previously and the outcome of it was KEEP because of many HIGHLY reliable references. Also, there is no major edit on last few months then why suddenly it went for delete??
Also, on what base I have been blocked?!!!
Jaydev Pala (talk) 07:56, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Coderzombie (talk) 10:56, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:34, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:34, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Alot of references here that need cleaning up by the editor. However there are two decent references:

"Ahmedabad-based actor Abhinay Banker of Acktors Theatre company decided to portray Imrozs and Amritas relationship in his new play Main Tenu Phir Milangi. He got interested in the writers life after reading her biography. Banker says,I was intrigued by Amritas life and later read another book written by Uma Trilok that chronicles the relationship and personal conversations between the poetess and Imroz. " The Indian Express and another in The Times of India i would suggest a good cleanup rather than a delete. 80.193.74.158 (talk) 17:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:80.193.74.158 Thank you for saying 'Keep'. After spending around 14 years in this field, at present can see his name as a writer in few gujarati movies as well which I want to update in near future after getting reliable source. I do agree that above lines need cleanup and not delete of whole page itself! Many thanks againJaydev Pala (talk) 11:21, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ Everyone: When 1st time page went for delete request, I tried my level best to re-write it with the help of many admins/moderators/experts in Wiki Live Chat. I do have copies of all those previous chat. They guided me and also edited wherever needed. I added at-least 50+ most treatable resources. After all this, we should not go back to point A and start the same discussion again and again. In addition, one can always edit the page as per their best knowledge then why rather than doing so, people are asking for delete? Do they are having any 'Personal Benefit' from the removal?! Otherwise one can read the perious delete discussion which resulted in KEEP. I hope everyone will be agree on this. Apologies for any errors which might have occurred while writing this on this page if am wrong.Jaydev Pala (talk) 11:26, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.