Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhinav Gomatam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abhinav Gomatam[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced actor. Fails notability. DragoMynaa (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep: The subject is mentioned and discussed in a number of Times of India articles, such as https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/telugu/movie-reviews/ee-nagaraniki-emaindi/movie-review/64785903.cms, where he is praised for his performance in Ee Nagaraniki Emaindhi. He starred in that film, which seems to have been quite notable, and has had supporting roles in a number of other films too, so he might just pass WP:NACTOR. He appears to be an up and coming actor, so I'd be willing to let the article stand. Dflaw4 (talk) 11:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as has some prominent roles in notable films as confirmed in reliable sources such as national newspapers such ss Times of India and others and therefore passes WP:NACTOR so that deletion is unnecessary, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 18:43, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete according to the wikipedia article, the subject has 10 credits as film actor. According to my search, the subject has only two significant roles (in the movies released is 2017, and 2018). Out of 10 credits, the wikipedia article cant name 5 of his characters, and one credits as "cameo as a psychiatrist". Notability guideline for actors requires significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Our subject doesnt have it. Verifiable existence doesnt mean notability. To achieve notability significant coverage is required; which the subject doesnt have, therefor subject fails general notability criteria as well. Also per user deflower: WP:TOOSOON. —usernamekiran (talk) 21:35, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:03, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He has three prominent roles in notable feature films, third in the credits of Meeku Maathrame Cheptha, fourth in the credits of Ee Nagaraniki Emaindhi, and third in the credits of Malli Raava which is enough for criteria 1 of WP:NACTOR imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:06, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Atlantic306: Hi. Like I said in my vote/comment above, he has prominent roles only in Ee Nagaraniki Emaindhi, and Malli Raava. I will provide the sources in a few hours. —usernamekiran (talk) 10:14, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

usernamekiran(talk), I'm not clear on your position. Are you arguing that the subject fails WP:NACTOR because he does not have "multiple" significant roles in notable productions, or because the roles themselves are not "significant"? Dflaw4 (talk) 06:27, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:16, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Nom and usernamekiran. My location may present some sourcing bias, as I could only verify what has already been shown, but links to "YouTube", "idlebrain" (2), and "facebook" does not satisfy the WP:BLP sourcing criteria. Lacking basic biographical content such as age makes this a pseudo-biography. The previous comments seems to center around what "minimum degree" of bare notability there might be. A lack of reliable and independent sources seems to indicate it might be WP:TOOSOON. Otr500 (talk) 15:50, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Satisfies criteria 1 of WP:NACTOR and WP:SIGCOV with three significant roles in three films as supported by multiple articles in The Times of India. My WP:BEFORE search yielded numerous articles verifying that content.4meter4 (talk) 14:45, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.