Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhijith (Actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:03, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Abhijith (Actor)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I reviewed this new article and tagged it to notify the author what was required to keep it from deletion but they simply removed the tags without improving the article. Subject does not appear to meet notability guidelines, article is not referenced at all, one external link to youtube. Content is unverifiable due to the above. Apparent COI and NPOV problems. Article falls just short of CSD guidelines, and I see little point PRODing based on the authors actions so far. Pol430 talk to me 14:55, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have cleaned up the article and removed the POV entries and undue praise. I could not find much coverage of him in english language sources. Will search and add if i can find any sources in Kannada language. --Nayvik (talk) 08:02, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:14, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per good faith in the efforts for cleanup and sourcing provided by User:Nayvik. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable even if all claims are true. Subject or someone close to him appears to be involved in the article, so if he or she can't add notability-demonstrating material by now, it's their own damn fault. EEng (talk) 20:10, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The subject does not reach article worthy level of notability. --Stormbay (talk) 03:47, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.