Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abhi[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dictionary definition preserved from deletion ages ago for spurious reasons. Solemn1 (talk) 16:08, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't even agree with the NOTDICTIONARY rule, and I still can't find any value to this article. The two sources are a dictionary and an OR link to the Rig Veda. What I can't understand is that it has over 250 edits and has persisted since 2007. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 17:55, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:16, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting not eligible for Soft Deletion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:35, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as wiktionary material. There are few pages linking this, but a look at the use cases only convinced me more. Suitskvarts (talk) 08:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.