Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhay Agrawal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Abhay Agrawal[edit]

Abhay Agrawal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doctor that appears to fail WP:GNG. Most of the previous content was copyright violations that seemed aimed at promoting bariatric surgery. He does get a few quotes in Indian magazines concerning weight loss, but they are not articles about him, so the coverage does not add up to what is required by WP:GNG from what I can see. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - This article fails to meet the criteria of WP:GNG. After a secondary search on this man, I find little evidence to support his notoriety. Therefore I believe this to be a case of WP:TOOSOON and should be removed. V.Putnam (talk) 04:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:24, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:24, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:52, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is an industry that turns out a lot of promotional material, and as far as I can tell from searching that is what we have on Agrawal. Nothing seems to be approaching indepth coverage in independent sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:49, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.