Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:00, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Abh[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This does not establish notability independent of Crest of the Stars through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 15:08, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:54, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:54, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:54, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:26, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to dab page ABH. --BDD (talk) 00:14, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge - Redirecting to a disambiguation and purging the content does not result in a net benefit to Wikipedia. Let's ponder merging this instead. Looking at the media, we see a collection of novels and short stories that total over 20 entries in the series. So the Abh are sort of a fictional ethnic group that is pivotal to the understanding of the novels and the anime and the film. Now the novelist won two major awards for the work... if not for the lack of citations I'd think that merging it or creating a page about the work (all-inclusive) for the series would be best. 209.255.230.32 (talk) 13:22, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:49, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, discuss, maybe merge. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 02:40, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.