Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abella Danger (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:59, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abella Danger[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a BLP that lacks proper sourcing thst basically comprises clickbait, interviews, proper sources not actually mentioning her and award announcements. Has not been reviewed since pornbio was depreceated and this looks ripe for consideration under a more realistic standard. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:23, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:23, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:23, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Shellwood (talk) 21:25, 17 December 2020 (UTC) [reply]

Delete While she is in fact a notable pornographic film actress, I’ve been pro-deleting this article for a year now because there simply aren’t adequate sources for it. Maybe that will change in the future but for now, not at all. I try to reject the Wiki-wide belief system that just because someone is in pornography that tabloids become accpetable to use. Nope. Rules are rules. Trillfendi (talk) 22:34, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there is not enough reliable, 3rd-party, indepdent secondary sourcing that covers her signifcantly enough to justify an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep She is a notable adult film star and there are sources that can help establish her notability, however, I don't really consider it enough to convince me for a strong keep. Here are the non-porn-centric sources I found:

“Abella Danger on Porn Shaming, Faux Feminism and Kanye” from ‘’Paper (magazine)’’
“Porn Star Abella Danger Apologizes For Mia Khalifa Twitter Spat” from ‘’International Business Times’’
“Porn Star Abella Danger Apologises For Mia Khalifa Comments While Defending Industry” from UNILAD
“Bella Thorne Taught Abella Danger 'A Lot' on the Set of Her PornHub Movie” from MovieWeb
“Kiss kiss bang bang with porn star Abella Danger” from SSENSE - It’s an interview and yes it’s from a company.

The following can also help build WP:BASIC

“Spend a Day at the Beach with Abella Danger” from ‘’Paper (magazine)’’
“Porn Star Abella Danger ‘Learned a Lot’ From Bella Thorne On Set of ‘Her & Him,’ Her PornHub Directorial Debut” from ‘’In Touch Weekly’’ (gossipy publication but it’s a feature interview with her and it’s not as horrendous as say, Mirror)
“As Miami Beach Pride Nears, Native Youth Opens Up About Her Sexuality” from ‘’Miami New Times’’
“How August Ames’ Suicide Is Changing the Porn Industry” from Rolling Stone’’
“Los Angeles is a “City on Fire” in Gaby G’s new video” from Earmilk’’
“For Gaby G, Formerly Known as Native Youth, Sex Sells R&B” Miami New Times’’

…and a ton more. Again, weak keep on my end. Missvain (talk) 02:38, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

Abella Danger: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know from Heavy (website)
Call ‘Em the Dirty Dozen: The 12 Most Popular Stars in Adult Entertainment from Fortune (magazine) reprinted by Yahoo Finance [1]

Morbidthoughts (talk) 07:57, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This kind of makes my point. If this is the best we can come up with, then we are far short of what is required for a good quality BLP and I don't feel these get us there for even a marginal one. Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:20, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A handful of brief mentions about a twitter spat, their opinion on someone's suicide, etc... do not add up to a notable biography. Zaathras (talk) 02:15, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteHe does not have enough fame.--Pmand ^{(talk • Contributions)} 11:56, 23 December 2020 (UTC) WP:STRIKESOCK — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 09:34, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Pmand: You mean her? Unless I am missing something, their gender is made quite clear throughout the article. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 09:31, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Missvain and Morbidthoughts. Might be just enough to meet the bar of notability, but it seems like enough. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 09:28, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.