Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1969)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Feel free to request a refund if someone wants to make a List of Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited cricketers list and merge in the content. Sjakkalle (Check!) 17:44, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1969)[edit]

Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1969) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. I found no coverage about him. Störm (talk) 22:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - 57 names to look through for Sui - more than many other teams, including two international players with threadbare articles. Bobo. 22:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a total and complete failure of GNG. I am hoping we can removed these not really articles from Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:48, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Is that how you feel about your own article creations too? Are they "not really" articles? Why were they deleted? Bobo. 16:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - So used to these happening that I think we've grown tired of !voting these days. Bobo. 09:38, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Nominally passes NCRIC, which by consensus only provides an extremely weak presumption of notability, but fails all meaningful guidelines including GNG and SPORTCRIT. No sources beyond wide ranging databases. No suitable list to merge into. wjematherplease leave a message... 11:38, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the (slightly) new consensus in Wikipedia that 1 game to meet a project guideline isn't nearly enough when failing all other guidelines. Geschichte (talk) 10:00, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.