Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Raouf Khan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Black Kite 00:46, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Raouf Khan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has no references and no independent sources appear to be available. No indication that this person meets WP:POLITICIAN. Utility Monster (talk) 22:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. —Utility Monster (talk) 00:27, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —Utility Monster (talk) 00:27, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I have moved this article to the more common spelling in English: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Passes WP:POLITICIAN as a mayor of a major city. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:46, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. His position as mayor/taluka nazim is verified by coverage in multiple reliable sources:[1]. Fences&Windows 00:57, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - being the mayor of a major city and having coverage by multiple sources is enough to satisfy WP:POLITICIAN.--Unionhawk ^Talk ^E-mail ^Review 18:31, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - mayor of large city and covered by multiple sources.--Staberinde (talk) 20:16, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.