Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdillah El Oufir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:33, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abdillah El Oufir[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD rationale was Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE from the sources presented and from a quick search. The prizes that he is said to have won are not sufficient enough to count as an WP:ANYBIO pass.

Contested with Improvement of WP:ANYBIO wish it was removed due to lack of valid information about the prizes that the article says.

Still not convinced that there is enough notability here. Source analysis to follow. Nothing decent found in a WP:BEFORE search. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:00, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:00, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Morocco-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:00, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:00, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source analysis - Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:04, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Source assessment table:
http://femmesdumaroc.com/actualite/les-grands-gagnants-du-concours-international-de-films-courts-ana-maghribia-devoiles-45658	?	Mentioned once	✘ No
https://www.networthspot.com/abdillah-el-oufir/net-worth/	Totally unreliable database scraper with no reputation for fact checking	Coverage is trivial	✘ No
https://lnt.ma/video-youtubeur-tourne-derision-service-militaire/		Has one sentence about him	✘ No
https://www.medi1tv.com/ar/%D9%85%D8%B9-%D8%B9%D8%A8%D8%AF-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A5%D9%84%D9%87-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%88%D9%81%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D9%88-%D8%A3%D9%8A%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%A8%D9%88%D8%B3%D9%84%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%A7-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%AC-57440-225		Appearing as a guest on a news program is not enough to justify a stand-alone article on its own.	✘ No
https://vcc.careercenter.ma/vcc/fiche-evenement/5/5541		I can't see where he is mentioned	✘ No
https://iq-tik.ixspy.com/influencers/detail/6766279185335944198_abdillah.eloufir		Social media stats page	✘ No
https://www.picuki.com/media/2162027830576204357	Self-published	Social media post with very little coverage	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Delete – I agree with Spiderone that none of the sources currently in the article are adequate, and my searches find nothing else that could constitute significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails the GNG/WP:BASIC. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:22, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiderone We made some changes to the previous post to improve the theme by replacing the more reliable and notable links. Jhonricke (talk) 23:56, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

this and this were added but neither of them show significant coverage (see WP:SIGCOV so my opinion is still 'delete' Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:27, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiderone This is a new stub. This topic isn't reliable enough at the moment, but it will take longer to finish with serious research. It shouldn't be abandoned until further notice. Jhonricke (talk) 11:14, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per above source analysis by Spiderone, fails WP:GNG. DMySon (talk) 11:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:GNG Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 20:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG, and probable UPE. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:03, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Likely to be UPE.The creating editor's user page suggests there is a potential for it Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 13:29, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The Sources mentioned are not reliable, fails notability.Aloolkaparatha (talk) 07:46, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.