Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aastha Chaudhary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 10:54, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aastha Chaudhary[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Hindi actress with insufficient WP:RS to satisfy WP:ENTERTAINER or even WP:GNG … dated PROD contested by author. — The Bipolar Anon-IP Gnome (talk) 05:40, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Check the official website of STAR India TV Network. What can you say now?? Have I edited the same. Check the about us page of Indya.com if you are unsure. If she is un-notable why did she got a great lead role in her first time?? And, I think you people have some problem with Indian content, if I am not wrong. UnbeatableIndia2020 (talk) 05:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with wikipedia now a days ...???? I think they have some problem with Indian content. UnbeatableIndia2020 (talk) 05:55, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Any person cannot project himself/herself as notable. I am a fan of her. and i think her page should be created as she is notable enough for the same. This frequent nomination in deletion log of such a notable T.V Actress means that the concept of deletion without observing is going on. Please refer to the wikipedia pages links on this article. especially those related to the TV Serials done by the actress .i.e. Babul Ka Aangann Chootey Na and Aise Karo Naa Vidaa. There anybody with a normal observing power can find out her name and details. And, you are also not ready to treat Indya.com as reliable source, which is the most reliable source and people even cite their sources while in discussion in forums,etc. If thats so, the wikipedia policies then thanks a lot for such great policies. UnbeatableIndia2020 (talk) 06:06, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I just added three more reliable sources - one from Times of India(TOI), one from MSN India and one from DNA India. check it in references heading and decide what to do. thanks UnbeatableIndia2020 (talk) 06:28, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sadly, I feel this actress fails WP:BIO. No Gnews hits, and all the regular Ghits only go to blogs and social networking sites. By the way, UnbeatableIndia2020, accusing those of us that !vote "delete" of being against Indian content isn't the wisest thing to do. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:45, 13 November 2010 (UTC)Keep per the new sources. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:03, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:12, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:12, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice (or Userfy if asked) as being WP:TOOSOON for this individual. Nice that she got a lead role first time out the gate, but her short career fails WP:ENT and lack of coverage fails WP:GNG. As it stands, this seems of WP:BLP1E for now. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:17, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Struck my delete based upon reasoned opinion from User:Sodabottle below. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:34, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep None of the Above. The decision to delete a notable actor from India smells bad when the subject page in question contains a beg for money message from Jimbo Wales. There is clearly way too much East Coast user/admin bias on these deletions. A lead role is notible whether it be a long or short career. Actors and artistic performers should not be deleted by armchair critics who have no personal knowledge or have actually seen them perform. PsychClone —Preceding undated comment added 21:55, 13 November 2010 (UTC). Trolling struck per ANI consensus. Favonian (talk) 21:31, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I fail to see what Jimbo Wales (who hasn't taken part in this discussion so far) has to do with an Indian actress, unless you know something we don't. Also, how do you know where any of us come from (unless we say so explicitly on our userpages)? I for one don't come from the east coast. I've never even been to the USA. You don't know my ethnic origin - I don't even know what a quarter of it is myself. "Actors and artistic performers should not be deleted by armchair critics who have no personal knowledge or have actually seen them perform." So who should decide? You? Your qualification being? "The decision to delete a notable actor" - but is she notable? To me, she is as notable as anyone who acts in soap opera - my apologies if this series isn't one but if not, it's similar to. It is at least referenced. I am not !voting here, but would point out to you that if you want to support the article it is best to do so using Wikipedia's policies and the existing references. Show people who may not have read them how they do indicate notability. Referring to another discussion, one doesn't have to be an expert to know that something referenced by a personal site, twitter and facebook is definitely not notable. Here, discounting the blogspot one, there are references that could be good. Explain to us how they are, and how reliable they are as sources. Don't play the racist card or try to belittle editors like Schmidt, who has gone in and saved many articles against quite high odds. Peridon (talk) 22:26, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - She has had two named lead roles. ~~One supporting and one lead. The one she had the lead role lasted for a hundred episodes and seven months.~~ Both shows are notable productions - one has run for three years and the other seven months (hundreds of episodes for both). She has had two exclusive interviews with Times of India and DNA and one in Tely Chakkar. So i would say she is just about makes it in both WP:ENT and WP:GNG. (OMG, i am voting keep in a AfD where MQS has voted delete!) --Sodabottle (talk) 04:15, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Changing my opinion based upon new information offered immediately above. Now that it has been shared that she has had lead roles in more than one notable project. This brings her in under WP:ENT... and as WP:BLP1E no longer applies, the coverage is enough per WP:GNG. My thanks to User:Sodabottle Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:34, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Decided to !vote after all. Thanks to Sodabottle for taking up the challenge I issued to what turned out to be a troll. (Only found out later...) Good explanation. Peridon (talk) 14:30, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.