Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Hawkins (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Calidum 20:52, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Hawkins[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub article with a single reference fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. (Please note the other Aaron Hawkins AFD is about a different person with the same name.) Calidum 20:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:04, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep He's an IEEE fellow, so meets WP:NPROF C3. Judging from his Google Scholar, he also probably meets WP:NPROF C1. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 20:29, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Firm pass of WP:Prof#C1. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:43, 30 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:02, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Snow keep. Pass of WP:PROF#C1 for heavily-cited publications, double pass of #C3 for the IEEE Fellowship and Fellow of the Optical Society of America, and pass of #C8 for being editor-in-chief of IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics. Maybe speedy because the nomination didn't even consider our academic notability guidelines, but in any case I doubt anyone taking those guidelines seriously is likely to choose deletion. And the poor state of our article is not a valid reason for deletion: AfD is not for cleanup. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:34, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Snow keep, per all of the above comments. The subject passes several criteria of WP:PROF, including C3 as the fellow of IEEE and of the Optical Society, and C6 as an editor-in-chief of a major journal. The citation data is also impressive with GScholar h-index of 44, and there is at least one significant award; so also passes WP:PROF#C1. Nsk92 (talk) 11:49, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Snow keep for unambiguously passing WP:PROF on multiple counts. XOR'easter (talk) 15:29, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.