Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aarielle Alexis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per WP:SNOW, WP:IAR, WP:CSD#A7. Nobody wants the article kept and there's no point dragging this out any longer. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:20, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aarielle Alexis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP save for an IMDB link. I declined an A7 because of a link to a possibly notable event, but I really don't think this person needs a mention on Wikipedia, and they might thank us for deleting it 25 years from now. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:19, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No credible assertion of notability. Attending an awards show without being nominated doesn't count. No claim of passing WP:PORNBIO. No reliable source coverage found for WP:GNG, just routine press releases in the porn trade press. 30 porn films (57 per IAFD) do not make an exceptional career in porn. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Gene93k. Not a shred of notability in the article. -- fdewaele, 14 July 2015, 20:42 CET

Speedy delete per WP:A7. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 21:23, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One reason for sending to AfD first is if it comes back again (as these things sometimes do), it can be stamped on via WP:CSD#G4 without too much argument. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 23:43, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete comes no where close to passing notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:24, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.