Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aamer Iqbal (cricketer, born 1990)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No suitable target for a redirect. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:16, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aamer Iqbal (cricketer, born 1990)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, nothing in coverage. Störm (talk) 17:34, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep has played List A cricket, so passes WP:NCRIC. So much for your own comment at ANI of "I have decided to leave the WP:CRIC and will never AfD any cricket article in future nor I will participate in their discussion or close any AfD". Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:25, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Lahore Eagles cricketers or similar Has played 2 List-A matches but I can't find any coverage, using similar precedent to that used by WP:FOOTY when a player has one or a few matches but no coverage, they are deleted/redirected. I second Lugnuts' comments on the ANI, especially as there seem to be a number of AFD's here again, which was one of the concerns brought up at the ANI. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unable to find any significant coverage (only wide-ranging databases consisting mainly of scorecard data) so this fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. A trivial pass of NCRIC does not trump the lack of coverage. No suitable redirect/merge target. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 19:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete subject is not even close to passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:04, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Coverage and notable reliable sources not found. TheDreamBoat (talk) 14:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.