Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aam Aadmi Party, Gujarat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Aam Aadmi Party. Liz Read! Talk! 20:02, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aam Aadmi Party, Gujarat[edit]

Aam Aadmi Party, Gujarat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:BRANCH, WP:GNG and WP:ORG.- TheWikiholic (talk) 09:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Gujarat. Shellwood (talk) 10:47, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge/Redirect to Aam Aadmi Party. This is a brand new party that first contested elections in 2022. As far as I can tell they won positions only at the local level, none in the state assembly. If they become more successful in the future the redirect could be re-expanded to a full article. -- MelanieN (talk) 18:21, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:07, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect as suggested. Mccapra (talk) 13:32, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect, this page is too long for a party with 0 seats in assembly holding 0 municipal corporations. Only place where the party has a decent amount of seats would be the Surat Municipal Corporation but they don't even have a majority there. For what it's worth the AAP did contest the 2017 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election, but they got less than 0.1% votes. Overall this page just isn't notable enough and should probably be redirected. Ok123l (talk) 12:38, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.