Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A dark conscience

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedied as G7 (NAC) SwisterTwister talk 19:41, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A dark conscience[edit]

A dark conscience (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed without comment or improvement. original concern was: No evidence of meeting notability (films) guidelines or general notability guideline. Even if this article weren't created by the director (User:Scout Collins), I find no evidence that this article is anything less than undue promotion of a film that has received no significant attention. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 22:08, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Alts:
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
filmmaker:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:19, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And now, the article creator has blanked the article and requested its speedy deletion. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 18:55, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.