Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A book that never dies I

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow delete. Bencherlite ^Talk 08:20, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A book that never dies I[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A book, actually a poem, that was just released today via "online magazines". It is by an non-notable author. Only ref in article gives one paragraph about the book and says it was released last February. Nothing says notable. Bgwhite (talk) 05:13, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Bgwhite (talk) 05:15, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:00, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Reference to an article by one Joseph Yaw Frimbong that predates this newly-published poem, article contributed by new editor User:Josephyaw who also contributed a speedy-deleted article on one J.Y.Frimpong - a slight hint of WP:COI. No evidence of attained notability. (Creative works don't qualify for CSD A7 but I wonder if this meets CSD G11 as promotional?) AllyD (talk) 07:31, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find anything that would show that this is ultimately notable enough for its own article. The only source I found that looks relatively decent is this one, which is somewhat dodgy seeming. Even if we count it as a RS, it's not enough to keep an article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:01, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; I can't find any evidence that this is notable (hat-tip to User:AllyD for their research into the actions around this article). Ironholds (talk) 03:14, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.