Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Witch Alone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 06:05, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Witch Alone[edit]

Does this book blurb need its own article? The author has her own page where her books are all listed, but only this book has its own page. The summary seems very much a blurb for the book. If there is something notable about the author's beliefs/practices, it seems to me it'd be better on the author's page. Eileen R 23:07, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - there's no real notablity requirement for books, see [1] —Hanuman Das 03:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are proposed guidelines for determining whether books are notable; maybe this book satisfies the proposed guidelines but I would need to see more evidence to be convinced of that. --Metropolitan90 03:06, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect--Peta 06:11, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no valid reason has been given for deletion. -999 (Talk) 14:57, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sorry Eileen, the book does appear on many libraries shelves' and is spread over the world. That alone allows the book to pass the current notability guidelines. An ODIN search of the Tri-State area (MN,ND,SD) shows 41 libraries have this book on their shelves. --Brian ^{(How am I doing?)} 20:14, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above.--Schonken 11:26, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.