Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Time to Keep

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Erik9 (talk) 02:25, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Time to Keep[edit]

The authors of this play clearly wrote it on the basis that every pupil in The Thomas Hardye School who wanted a part would get a part. They managed to get the Grauniad to review it but I don't think that makes it notable. Sgroupace (talk) 04:33, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yes it got reviews from the Guardian and the TLS, but that doesn't really make it notable. Alberon (talk) 10:51, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - not only reviewed by the two major papers in the arts field but it is written by two notable playwrights. TerriersFan (talk) 17:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Agree with TerriersFan, notability is established. §FreeRangeFrog 19:24, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I don't know that notability is established, but I feel it deserves a chance to grow a bit. Cottonshirt (talk) 10:23, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Reviews in publications such as The Guardian and TLS are exactly what make plays notable. The whole point of our notability criteria is that we leave it to the editors of such publications to tell us what is notable, rather than make our own subjective judgements. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:51, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.