The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. WMMartin 17:50, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, with apologies to Missvain who did an otherwise excellent job of cleaning up an ugly and poorly-done stub. --Arvedui 03:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
