Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Miracle of Science

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:44, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Miracle of Science[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Apologies for procedural mistake in PRODing)

Seems to be non-notable; Google is only really showing me user-generated sources, and I can't see any suitable targets for redirect/merge as author and artist both seem non-notable. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 12:07, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Even restricting the search to the years following the webcomic's publication, there are no RS on it. It may be a good work of art, and it may have had a passionate fan community at one point, but without RS we're in no place to judge that. If someone does find reliable sources I will happily change my mind. --Tserton (talk) 12:34, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BoomboxTestarossa I recommend removing the bold from "delete", because it makes it appear as though you are casting a !vote, and as nominator you cannot do this. — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 12:35, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Webcomics. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Only found mentioned in online stores and online encyclopedias. The subject does not seem to have reviews or coverage that can pass WP:GNG. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 21:54, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Sadly there do not seem to be any sources covering this one. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 09:38, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, I have added a reference to the article that seems Ok (a conference by a Ph professor in economics). The sources pointed at the article talk page 16 years ago (this an this archived versions), maybe could be considered as reviews by "experts in the field" (I'm not totally sure though). Anyway, it seems that the webcomic was very popular at the time. Alexcalamaro (talk) 18:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly not notable and not by a notable author either. Hadal1337 (talk) 15:44, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.