Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Legacy of Light (trilogy)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 02:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Legacy of Light (trilogy)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As a partly unreleased trilogy of books, it is too soon for this trilogy to pass WP:NBOOK. I cannot find any sort of coverage which would suggest that any of these books are notable. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 22:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 22:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 22:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There are no reliable sources discussing the trilogy of books as a whole, nor any of the individual books. I did find a bit on the author, though those article confirmed what I suspected, that these books are self-published. Without any sources, this does not pass the WP:GNG. Rorshacma (talk) 01:18, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The author seems like an amazing person, but the books just don't pass notability guidelines at this point in time. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It could be notable, however I haven't seen many sources about it, and the third book hasen't even been released yet. Omniscientmoose42 (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Goodreads is not a source that we can build articles on. Nor can we source articles to the subject of the article. We thus have no 3rd party, reliable useable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:20, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.