Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Father's Diary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Father's Diary[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created by a UPE. Fails WP:NFILM – multiple reviews are required – here, awards in non-notable ROTM festivals and coverage is tagged as "news desk", so probably paid for. Michalis Andreou (talk) 20:24, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 September 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 20:45, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As always, films do not all get an automatic free pass over WP:NFILM just because they exist — they have to show evidence of significance, supported by WP:GNG-worthy reliable source coverage. But the only notability claim being attempted here is film awards from minor film festivals, referenced to their own self-published websites about themselves rather than proper media coverage to establish the notability of said festivals, and the rest of the sourcing just ain't cutting it otherwise. Even "film notable because awards" still requires the awards to be notable awards. Bearcat (talk) 14:54, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I am not persuaded that this passes WP:NFILM 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:02, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.