Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Different Breed of Killer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Secret ^account 18:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Different Breed of Killer[edit]

Non notable band that fails WP:MUSIC Nuttah (talk) 12:41, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep, Leaning Towards Neutral. I suppose this should be kept, just for the band's few fans, but the links aren't the best. TopGearFreak ^Talk 12:54, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is a reasoning that is not based on policy. The band's fans can visit the myspace or create their own fansite without the aid of Wikipedia.

Link farming is not the purpose of wikipedia. JamesBurns (talk) 01:29, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral. I have no idea whether the record label is notable or if the band members have been in other notable acts. I can therefore not establish whether the band is notable, but I felt I needed to mention this so other people can focus on finding out if this should be kept based on the right reasons. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Seems to be notable... just barely. Jonathan321 (talk) 17:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hmmm... This site offered up a review of one of the band's albums, but only because the site is selling the album. Most of their Ghits are from lyrics databases. Nothing helpful from google news. There seems to be no unbiased commentary from notable sources. Nothing I can find about them meets WP:N or WP:BAND. Themfromspace (talk) 20:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes WP:MUSIC#C1, [1], [2], [3] and [4]. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 02:24, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Does not meet WP:BAND. JamesBurns (talk) 01:29, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- How so? The comment above clearly demonstrates that it does. --Pwnage8 (talk) 04:12, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 13:31, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:56, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Google brings up plenty. Sam ^Blab 01:35, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 23:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.