Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Book Of

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 01:21, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Book Of[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was draftified in order to give editor time to potentially provide sources. They did not, simply moving the article back into mainspace. Searches were difficult due to the generality of the name, but I couldn't find any in-depth coverage. There's also the fact that this seems to be simply a promotional article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:27, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Possibly WP:TOOSOON. JustJared announced that Gavin Leatherwood is shirtless on their July cover (had to remove the link, apparently JustJaredJr is blacklisted), and that's about all I could find, other than ads and their own site. It is an unfortunate name for web searches, but there doesn't seem to be notice or coverage of this publication yet. Schazjmd (talk) 00:05, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Can't find significant coverage of either the magazine or editor Irvin Rivera (although there are few photos by him online there is little in depth about him or his work). No obvious reason why this is more than just another unimportant online publication: not all magazines or websites are notable. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:15, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:10, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't source it. Please ping me to reconsider if you can.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Would have supported draftifying it, but since that option was already used and I don't see significant coverage, I'm !voting delete. – Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 23:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since the text is stricly promotional and the article entirely sourced to its subject. -The Gnome (talk) 10:12, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.