Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A 4 Effort

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A 4 Effort[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a non-notable student improv troupe. E. Fokker (talk) 00:20, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The group has been invited to open for numerous professional comics and other student organizations. Calling this group non-notable would be very similar to calling other student performance groups the same thing, even though such groups with similar pages already exist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Homsar727 (talk • contribs) 00:22, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then please add the reliable sources to back up this claim. E. Fokker (talk) 00:30, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References have been added to the page highlighting the group's legitimacy as well as some record of its notable performances. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Homsar727 (talk • contribs) 04:54, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The first ref on this article shows nothing of notability. Second is a Passing ref to this group in an article that primarily covers another act. Being featured in a YouTube video does not signify notability. Does not meet WP:N. Pol430 (talk) 17:14, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Granted, the first reference is to highlight our legitimacy as a Rutgers organization and although the second reference mostly revolves around another group, the inclusion of the article highlights that we have made at least one major documented contribution to the university community. Admittedly, it is very hard to find proper references because of how little documentation is available for such things. This is prevalent in numerous other Rutgers University organizations that have their own pages. (Homsar727 (talk) 05:43, 28 November 2010 (UTC))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.