Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AXAH

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2009 November 20.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 00:44, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AXAH[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability of this software product - Altenmann >t 03:33, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 November 20#AXAH DRV. Previously a redirect to AHAH, deleted out of process by the AfD nom, listed at DRV, restored, unredirected, and now here at AfD. --Tothwolf (talk) 05:11, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment on comment AHAH has not a single word about AXAH. - Altenmann >t 07:02, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Delete, this is a neologism about existing 30-year-old technology masquerading as a new idea. Ronabop (talk) 08:20, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge & redirect to AHAH, and I don't think it's entirely fair to call it a neologism, working in the web dev field I have heard this term used for some years now (although to be honest any AHAH or AXAH approach is much more likely to just be referred to, inaccurately, as "AJAX") --Stormie (talk) 05:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:04, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It can't be merged or redirected to AHAH, because that article was itself deleted as a result of AfD. JIP | Talk 18:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unable to locate any coverage of this term in reliable sources. --Cybercobra (talk) 05:56, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:BURDEN No sources in the article. Miami33139 (talk) 20:13, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.