Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AVM Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:10, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AVM Technology[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems promotional, maybe STOPzilla should also go - another discussion, if not merge into that one. I hesitate to say "speedy deletion". My first time doing AfD, seems right. Does it hinge on West Coast Labs being notable? Even if WCL is notable, do two (one? both from WCL) reviews from it make this technology notable? See also from employee Template_talk:Advert#Please_review_STOPzilla.27s_page. comp.arch (talk) 14:35, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete even if STOPzilla is not a scam. That might be however (or not) I don't know. Look at its early history and this [[1]] that I found. comp.arch (talk)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:12, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since the product STOPzilla would as indicated above be plenty. Normally there is a single article on any small company for that matter, not separate ones on each product and "technology" it uses (essentially a marketing campaign?). And clearly promotional (amusing since it is software, nothing to do with ecosystems as claimed - that is pure marketing language). W Nowicki (talk) 22:59, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.