Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARMv7TDMI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I can still restore the page history if anyone needs it, but per Sbmeirow below it is a useless redirect due to the typo. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ARMv7TDMI[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1) Minor subset of ARM7. 2) Article name is incorrect, because "v" should not be in the title, since that is typical of ARM architecture instead of ARM cores. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 13:44, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:55, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to ARM7 per nom.49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:41, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Processors are not a category I edit often, but what a waste of space this page seems! Its present contents would fill no more than an extra sentence on any of the main ARM architecture pages. Stroller (talk) 16:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note - I no longer need anything from ARMv7TDMI, so go ahead and delete it whenever you want. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 06:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.