Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/APh Technological Consulting

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Intellivision. Spartaz Humbug! 05:59, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

APh Technological Consulting[edit]

APh Technological Consulting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced for too long, still unable to find in-depth sources that indicate this company passes notability. MT TrainTalk 08:03, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 08:03, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 08:03, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 08:03, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Added some sources, not sure if it meets GNG.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 03:47, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • My inclination is a redirect to Intellivision. It's mentioned there multiple times and based on the sources available point to some decent involvement with the platform, but certainly not enough to elide its own article. --Izno (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Intellivision makes sense. I'm not seeing good enough sourcing for this one, but just based on the nature of the subject I would expect it to be notable. In the event we find more material for the article, with a redirect we won't lose what sourcing it has now. More to the point, it's a logical redirect target for the reasons given by Izno.--Martin IIIa (talk) 02:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.