Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AI video upscaler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Video scaler#AI upscaling. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AI video upscaler[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obviously AI generated WP:OR piece and there doesn't appear to be any actual coverage of this topic other than ads or questionable "top 10 best ai video upscalers 2024" type of lists. WP:JUNK StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 00:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 00:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I wonder if there's a good redirect target to either video scaler or image scaling. ~ A412 ^talk! 00:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Ai-written article about AI programs? I'm surprised there aren't sources about this, I don't see any sources, other than perhaps articles where it's briefly mentioned in hardware reviews for example. Oaktree b (talk) 00:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, can't see value in redirecting versus BLOWITUP. Article is oddly similar to a "10 Best" blog post at the Cyberlink website, about products which claim to use AI for video scaling. I can't find SIGCOV in secondary sources about the use of AI in video scaling sufficient for a separate article, just product pages. Wikishovel (talk) 07:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Redirect and merge if sourced properly~~ Redirect to Video scaler#AI upscaling – Rings bells of AI written, but AfD is not for cleanup. While not specifically written as "AI video upscaler", searching AI video upscaler on Google News gives us titles like Adobe unveils AI-driven Project ResUp for video upscaling, This YouTuber Upscaled a Scene From an 1895 Film to 4K 60FPS Using AI, others of that sort. Redirects are cheap, and this is a valid redirect in my opinion. TLA^tlak 11:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If not that I suggest renaming to AI upscaler. TLA^tlak 11:14, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest cleaning up and convert to a section in an "AI upscaler" article. Hym3242 (talk) 14:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hym3242, there is no AI upscaler. Video scaler and Image scaling are the targets that have been mentioned in the discussion. ~Kvng (talk) 14:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Video scaler: per TLA. - Master of Hedgehogs ^(converse) ^{(hate that hedgehog!)} 14:38, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, I'm questioning the wisdom of merging content that is suspected of being AI-generated.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect, do not merge to Video scaler#AI upscaling. - I added some (human generated) text, so now it's mentioned there. ~ A412 ^talk! 21:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, human. TLA^tlak 20:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, don't merge—this seems like a sensible solution. This article adds absolutely nothing of value to the 'pedia, or the world. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:11, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.