Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AIDAsol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 04:42, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AIDAsol[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 13:58, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver seren^C 23:34, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: A notice has been made to the associated WikiProject at WT:SHIPS#Cruise ship AFD per WP:AFD#Notifying interested people. -MBK₀₀₄ 04:47, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. Silver seren^C 23:34, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I found a number of German news sources that easily established notability. I added just a few translated ones in as EL's but there are more out there on Google News. Silver seren^C 23:34, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, cruise ships are inherently notable, per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carnival Glory (2nd nomination), especially my arguments there. -MBK₀₀₄ 04:48, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:N and multitudinous other cruise ship deletion nominations that failed. Haus^Talk 05:17, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per my arguments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SS Timothy Bloodworth (2nd nomination). As the ship is under construction it does not fail WP:CRYSTAL. Mjroots (talk) 05:48, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as for other cruise ships recently. A ship under construction has an element of WP:CRYSTAL about it, but it is not merely planned, the normal context for that guideline. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:23, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are several decent sources about this ship (including some in German), and that will definitely go up when the ship is complete. It is still notable now, as it is far into construction. I largely agree with MBK004: cruise ships, certainly of this size, are inherently notable. Jhbuk (talk) 18:04, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Click Google news link at the top of the AFD, and check it next time before nominating something on the basis you don't think there is coverage of something. Dream Focus 10:47, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ship sure to be of interest to travelers when it begins to operate. Perhaps someone can say where this ship will cruise, if known at this time. --DThomsen8 (talk) 20:48, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - notability has been established. Side point: am I the only one who wants to complain about their choice of names for the ships? —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 06:11, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The names of the ships, or the titles of the articles about them? Per WP:NC-S, these should be at "MV AIDAwhatever". Mjroots (talk) 11:40, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.