Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AGRE S.A.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 16:48, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AGRE S.A.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company does not appear to have been notable and it is no longer clear that it exists since the link to its website is dead. It was also created by a sockmaster user:Edson Rosa and their socks. I am One of Many (talk) 16:36, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can find no evidence of notability. In fact, if it weren't for the statement that it "was one of the largest real estate companies in Brazil", it would look like a speedy deletion candidate under speedy deletion criterion A7. However, I can find no confirmation of that claim. The creator of the article, who appears to have been a professional spammer, created numerous articles on businesses with similar claims of being "one of the biggest"/"the biggest"/"the third biggest" business in its field in its part of the world, and to the best of my knowledge never provided any sources to substantiate such claims. Certainly this article lacks substantiation. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:35, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 20:54, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Existence is not notability in itself, and this can only ben seen to have been a transient firm which filed accounts in 2009 and 2010. And that's it. AllyD (talk) 06:42, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:CORP criterias for maintenance within WP. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 13:02, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.