Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ADD-TV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 20:44, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ADD-TV[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local New York public access show that plays once a month. I cannot find any evidence that it is notable. Angryapathy (talk) 21:43, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've also nominated the awards created by this program for deletion: WP:Articles for deletion/Pill Awards. Angryapathy (talk) 21:53, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this show. Joe Chill (talk) 00:09, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Pill Awards? - To my surprise, LGBT publications across the US have written about these awards.[1] and they seem to have become more notable than the show itself. --Griseum (talk) 15:30, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:57, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable, no non-trivial third party coverage. 2 says you, says two 21:23, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I added numerous refs to Pill Awards. A merger still makes sense to me. --Griseum (talk) 01:59, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, (X! · talk) · @152 · 02:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete public-access shows are non-notable essentially by definition. No opinion about a possible merge, but it definitely can't stand as its own article. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:18, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to Pill Awards, perhaps with a mention there. I'd say Merge into the Pill Awareds, but I can't find secondary source support for most of the content of this article, my point is just that there's very little sourced material to carry over to Pill. --Joe Decker (talk) 22:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.