Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ACN 121 239 674 Limited
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep; however, once the new name is confirmed, there seems to be a concensus to move it, so I add my consent to such a move. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 11:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
ACN 121 239 674 Limited[edit]
Not notable Uni club. Does not pass WP:ORG DXRAW 08:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- DXRAW 08:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]
Keep It appears that you didn't read the article. This article concerns an organisation composed of, and replacing, three uni student organisations that have not had notability problems in the past. Joestella 09:17, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment for Joestella or whomever is in the know: Is this shelf company temporary, or is the new org to be named something without so many numbers in it, or is this the permanent name of the new organizaton? How that's answered will decide what happens from here. --Dennisthe2 23:54, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The article says "The transitional board will choose a name for the organisation before the commencement on Session 1, 2007. The new name is understood to be "Arc"." Joestella 01:16, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- In that case, I'd have to say weak delete. The transitional company itself is a transitional company and nothing more, and will, as near as I can tell, be effectively discarded in favor of the new org name ("Arc", or whatever it comes to be). It's not to say I'd discharge the new org - I'd likely not. --Dennisthe2 03:24, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and rename. I don't like the name as no-one is going to look for this name. Keep and rename to the actual name chosen by students asap. Given that most students on campus are members or at least contribute funds, it is more important than your run of the mill studnet club. Possibly merge with University of NSW. Capitalistroadster 01:42, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. We have articles on student unions - just because this one has a provisional name doesn't mean it should be deleted, because it has that name for a good reason - the situation with student unions is in a state of flux, and I have no doubt that it will be given a name soon. enochlau (talk) 04:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep' per Joestella and others. University clubs have never been held be inherently non-notable; a student union for large universities like UNSW should definitely be notable, especially given the fact that the author has chosen to merge them all into one article following the merger rather than write three underwritten articles on the old unions. As the equivalent Student Union at Sydney University (University of Sydney Union), Sydney's other large university, has an equivalent article that is not under threat from deletion, this one should definitely stay. JROBBO 03:31, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.