Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AC4 (album) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to AC4. (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp 💬 18:55, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AC4 (album)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NALBUM or WP:GNG. May be worth a redirect to AC4#Discography as an WP:ATD but I don't see it as valuable to merge the information. Last AfD was more than 7 years ago and attracted only two comments - closed as no consensus with no prejudice to swift renomination. it's not swift, but hopefully a 2nd AfD can establish a consensus after 7 years in CAT:NN. Boleyn (talk) 14:09, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:10, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to AC4: Barely found anything about the album. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 06:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to AC4. Since this isn't notable enough for it's own article, but a redirect seems fair anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:29, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to AC4 not a notable album the band are barley notable band probaly due to kerrang mentions DanTheMusicMan2 (talk) 10:26, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.