Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ABB Merchant Banking (Asia Business Builders)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:25, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ABB Merchant Banking (Asia Business Builders)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The reference stating newyorktimes is not related to newyorktimes. The Amazing Spiderman (talk) 04:02, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note the following: 1) The reference and link to New York Times article was corrected and now pointing correctly to the article in which ABB Merchant Banking's research on the property market is quoted. 2) Additional edits to reflect the specific notability of the firm have been added: one of the first boutiques to exist in the communist country/early mover impact on the M&A market in the country. [User talk: peter_hecham 3 October 2015] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter [email protected] (talk • contribs) 15:06, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:52, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:52, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:52, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. The sources available don't move beyond brief mentions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:53, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Inadequate evidence for notability DGG ( talk ) 02:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete likely as I haven't began looking at this closely but there's nothing to suggest better and a better article if possible can be started later. SwisterTwister talk 05:09, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.