Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ABA Bank

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:47, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ABA Bank[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find much in the way of independent or reliable sources, everything is either a press release or a blog. I can't verify the awards, and without those it doesn't seem to meet GNG. Primefac (talk) 02:14, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Notability not established. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 02:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:58, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:58, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now - A WP:TNT at best as my searches found nothing better than Books and browser links and this has existed since June 2008 and has never improved much although has at least changed since the first version. I would've pinged past user The Banner but it seems he will not be available for a month. SwisterTwister talk 05:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There seem to be a number of banking awards each year, even for Cambodia. International Banker awarded their two Cambodia awards in 2014 to Vattanac Bank. here; and in 2015 to the Foreign Trade Bank of Cambodia. here. ABA Bank did indeed win Global Finance's 2015 Best Bank in Cambodia award. here. The Golden Fince 2014 award for Cambodia went to Acleda Bank. here However, I could not find verification from a reliable source about the awards from The Banker and Euromoney. All in all, it appars that none of these awards may be notable. --Bejnar (talk) 22:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete searches on the engines do not show that it meets either WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:48, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.