Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A4 Bath Road park and ride (Bristol)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Any redirect is a separate editorial decision. Sandstein 20:15, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A4 Bath Road park and ride (Bristol)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I apologize as I know it's extremely long!

The entire article was copied & pasted from the current title to Bristol park and ride, Mattbuck had then got it split and so now we have the service number 904 (A4 Bath Road park and ride (Bristol)) and the article with the rest of the numbers (inc 904) (Bristol park and ride) - Basically we have 2 articles that are the exact same and so I propose redirecting this back to Bristol park and ride

As me and Matt disagreed on it being a redirect I said he could revert [1] and I assumed he was going to massively improve/source it but it never happened

Anyway like all bus routes on here 1 service number never warrants an article unless it's in London and is notable which this one isn't, Thanks and again sorry for the long reason!. –Davey2010^Talk 01:46, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:10, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:10, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both articles and redirect Bristol park and ride to the Bristol transport section. Per WP:GNG and WP:NOTTRAVEL there is nothing notable about a park and ride scheme.Charles (talk) 08:41, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unnecessary duplication and there isn't enough coverage to support two articles. But keep the article on the park and ride as a whole, as the sources cited are obviously enough to pass any reasonable requirement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.8.209 (talk) 01:13, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I recreated this was that this article about the A4 Bath Road scheme had existed for years, as had the equivalent one about the A4 Portway scheme. The Bath Road one was suddenly converted into an article about p&r in general, and this made no sense to me, so I had the article history split and the bath road page restored. If people think it needs to be deleted so be it. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:06, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
REdirect to Bristol park and ride. It may be useful to have one article, but not one of each separate service. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:10, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.