Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. N. Radhakrishnan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:48, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A. N. Radhakrishnan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, and WP:POLITICIAN. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 10:32, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:44, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:44, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete while he is a candidate for office he is not notable. If he wins that will change.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Satisfy both WP:GNG, and WP:POLITICIAN. I have just substantially developed the article. There are independent reliable sources. He is a senior leader of Bharatiya Janata Party in Kerala state and is a national executive committee member. 137.97.31.118 (talk) 16:34, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Being one of the six general secretaries of a political party's local organizing committee in one specific region is not an automatic WP:NPOL pass, and this features neither the substance nor the depth of sourcing needed to get him over WP:GNG in lieu.Akhiljaxxn (talk) 16:16, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Currently fails WP:NPOL. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:39, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:11, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not notable enough, search yields no reliable sources. all I got it is trivial mentions. QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 15:56, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets basic WP:GNG. Google news has about 170 news references about him. ~Leny Tee55~ 10:29, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails NPOL and BASIC. Subject has not been the subject of in depth coverage from multiple independent reliable sources. Passing mentions do not establish notability. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:18, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.